MSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E26
MotherboardMSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 18:47
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$196
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 86.5
1-Core 215
2-Core 429
126% 244 Pts
4-Core 820
8-Core 1224
127% 1,022 Pts
64-Core 1,424
88% 1,424 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 120%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$280
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 230
Parallax 152
132% 182 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 127
Splatting 102
110% 140 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 120%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
838GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,489
Write 1,447
Mixed 1,095
299% 1,343 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 62.8
214% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 677
DQ Write 640
DQ Mixed 271
310% 529 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C36-8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
149% Outstanding
MC Read 57.8
MC Write 45.7
MC Mixed 52.7
149% 52.1 GB/s
SC Read 51.4
SC Write 66.2
SC Mixed 57
166% 58.2 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 116%
This bench: 149%
Great: 174%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 0P 3R 5G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 16% 97 217 59 60 27" 1280 720 VSC0E39 XG2705
Typical B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26) Builds (Compare 303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 217%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 220%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,030
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback