Asus G10AC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus G10AC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G10AC
Memory17 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 18:40
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770S-$112
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 195
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 510
52% 423 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.8% Below average
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 56
Parallax 58.1
29% 49.7 fps
MRender 53.9
Gravity 46.1
Splatting 41.9
38% 47.3 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 415
Write 138
Mixed 374
68% 309 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 47
151% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
116GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 100 100 99 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 150
Write 151
Mixed 127
SusWrite 99.6
98% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS72105 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: A39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 140
Write 41.5
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 40.7
49% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX318C10FK2/16 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 HX318C10FK2/16 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.9% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 18.5
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 27" 1920 1080 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical G10AC Builds (Compare 369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus G10AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback