HP RP5 Retail System Model 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP RP5 Retail System Model 5810  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2175
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 17:13
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770S-$112
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 168
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 449
46% 369 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
EVGA(3842 6336) 2GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 18.5
15% 18.3 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 19.1
Splatting 0.2
8% 11.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S650 480GB
412GB free
Firmware: W0419B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 352 441 440 444 445 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 444
Mixed 403
SusWrite 424
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 22.5
116% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 33.4
94% 196 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 106%
WD Purple Surveillance 6TB (2017)-$120
5.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 132 129 166 163 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 157
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 145
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 15.9
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 18.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 HPN354B HP 27f
Typical RP5 Retail System Model 5810 Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP RP5 Retail System Model 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback