Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 16:56
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 77.5
1-Core 177
2-Core 350
106% 202 Pts
4-Core 683
8-Core 1,310
118% 996 Pts
64-Core 2,332
144% 2,332 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 203
Parallax 188
147% 191 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 187
Splatting 133
124% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1455 372 408 348 284 363 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 2,056
Write 2,086
Mixed 1,935
SusWrite 538
371% 1,654 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 78
272% 98.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,346
DQ Write 1,055
DQ Mixed 1,167
882% 1,189 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 253%
Great: 300%
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$60
138GB free
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 542 543 536 542 547 546 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,964
Write 559
Mixed 641
SusWrite 542
203% 926 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 57.4
213% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 595
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 494
390% 541 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 202%
Great: 333%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
485GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 147 149 148 149 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 173
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 148
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
8GB free
Firmware: JE3OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 66 67 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
34% Below average
Read 50.9
Write 46.3
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 67.4
36% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34%
Great: 50%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
567GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 142 145 139 146 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 126
Write 114
Mixed 74
SusWrite 143
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 DDR4 3000 CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 46.9
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 27.1
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 27.2
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback