Acer Predator PHN16-71

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Predator PHN16-71 (all builds)
Motherboard	RPL Compass_RTX
Memory	1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230907
Uptime	2.5 Days
Run Date	May 07 '24 at 15:55
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-13500HX 755 User benchmarks, average bench 99% U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 69.2 1-Core 143 2-Core 263 85% 158 Pts	4-Core 469 8-Core 673 72% 571 Pts	64-Core 921 57% 921 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 170F) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.68% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 8.8 Parallax 5.5 4% 6.4 fps	MRender 8.3 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 7.3 6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.68% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme HFS512GEJ9X125N 512GB 808 User benchmarks, average bench 384% 330GB free (System drive) Firmware: 51022A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1007 866 897 892 830 814 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	297% Outstanding	Read 3,243 Write 1,891 Mixed 1,638 SusWrite 884 424% 1,914 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 237 4K Mixed 46.5 244% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 1,037 DQ Write 828 DQ Mixed 927 695% 931 MB/s
Poor: 261% ↑ This bench: 297% Great: 480%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 1x8GB 1,721 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	60.7% Good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 20.6 63% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 18.4 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 98.9 40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	50	28	165	16"	1280 720	AUOD7A7

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PHN16-71 Builds (Compare 1,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 108%

UFO

Desktop 110%

UFO

Workstation 122%

UFO

System: Acer Predator PHN16-71

CPU
Core i7-13700HXIntelBench 108%, 3,030 samples	647x
Core i5-13500HXIntelBench 99%, 755 samples	469x
Core i9-13900HXIntelBench 115%, 8,895 samples	238x

GPU
RTX 4050 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 96%, 5,690 samples	313x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 8%, 5,195 samples	283x
RTX 4060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 113%, 18,525 samples	267x

SSD
HFS512GEJ9X125N 512GBNvmeBench 384%, 808 samples	573x
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TBNvmeBench 407%, 6,767 samples	309x
WD PC SN810 SDCQNRY-1T00-1014 1TBNvmeBench 487%, 593 samples	195x

RAM
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GBSamsungBench 120%, 26,893 samples	460x
MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 2x8GBMicronBench 120%, 12,360 samples	108x
MTC8C1084S1SC48BA1 1x16GBMicronBench 71%, 3,017 samples	98x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16