HP Laptop 15s-fq1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-fq1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86C9
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 15:25
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 112
51% 83.5 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 234
22% 185 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
HP(103C 86C9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7926
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.64% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 6.3
5% 5.3 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 11.4
7% 7.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.64%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDHBA256TCK-1AS1AABHA 256GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0V23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 236 257 207 218 188 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 771
Write 287
Mixed 365
SusWrite 223
91% 412 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 14
48% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 510
DQ Write 438
DQ Mixed 512
374% 487 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 187%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-XN 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.6% Poor
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 7.7
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 0 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE091F
Typical Laptop 15s-fq1xxx Builds (Compare 1,011 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15s-fq1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback