Asrock A320M Pro4 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M Pro4 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221026
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 14:24
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 66.1
1-Core 150
2-Core 274
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 1,169
104% 881 Pts
64-Core 1,572
97% 1,572 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 20
Parallax 32.3
20% 25.8 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 22.8
18% 21 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
721GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2331 1872 1775 1781 1803 1785 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 2,441
Write 2,428
Mixed 2,304
SusWrite 1,891
510% 2,266 MB/s
4K Read 63.8
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 81.5
261% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 1,150
DQ Write 857
DQ Mixed 958
729% 988 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 339%
Great: 431%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$107
3TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 193 189 191 188 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 188
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 190
106% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.3% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 22.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 19.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 0P 2R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 15% 20 142 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 AOC2270 2270W
History: Score 5: 0P 0R 1G 2B | Score 25: 0P 2R 3G 6B
Typical A320M Pro4 R2.0 Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $444
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback