Lenovo 82KB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82KB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 12:41
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
61% Good
Memory 64.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 214
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 335
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
8.2% Terrible
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 14.4
Parallax 13.8
10% 13.3 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 2.1
6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.2%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SSSTC CL1-4D256 256GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AS262 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 314 142 164 249 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1666
Write 1,025
Mixed 417
SusWrite 219
183% 832 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 18.4
112% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 683
DQ Write 432
DQ Mixed 174
233% 429 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 137%
Great: 156%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4AS004G-H2666GST Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.3% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 17.5
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 14.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 HKC023D
Typical 82KB Builds (Compare 1,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82KB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback