MSI PRO Z790-A MAX WIFI (MS-7E07)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 128%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E07
MotherboardMSI PRO Z790-A MAX WIFI (MS-7E07)  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240419
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 12:16
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700K-$382
U3E1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
128% Outstanding
Memory 83
1-Core 235
2-Core 471
134% 263 Pts
4-Core 925
8-Core 1851
164% 1,388 Pts
64-Core 3,880
240% 3,880 Pts
Poor: 124%
This bench: 128%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
XFX(1682 3117) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 16.1
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 14.2
13% 16.2 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 10.2
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 189
Write 152
Mixed 53.6
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 22.5
72% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 160
141% 214 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 122%
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$145
2TB free
Firmware: 620361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,204
Write 4,533
Mixed 3,142
884% 3,960 MB/s
4K Read 80.7
4K Write 273
4K Mixed 111
409% 155 MB/s
DQ Read 2530
DQ Write 1,757
DQ Mixed 2,128
1,593% 2,138 MB/s
Poor: 283% Great: 685%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
45GB free
Firmware: 0509
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11,029
Write 22.1
Mixed 44
766% 3,698 MB/s
4K Read 1,464
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 3.8
2,225% 490 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
462GB free
Firmware: CC4C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 154
Write 111
Mixed 83
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A364 500GB
146GB free
Firmware: 0509
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 53.2
Write 34.1
Mixed 28.8
29% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 58%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
101GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.5
Write 21
Mixed 2
20% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 2.7
201% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 37%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
107GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34.4
Write 21.1
Mixed 25.2
32% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 2.6
130% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
184% Outstanding
MC Read 77.5
MC Write 70.5
MC Mixed 68.6
206% 72.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 53.6
SC Mixed 31.7
103% 35.9 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 184%
Great: 198%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 23.8" 1920 1017 DELA0A2 DELL U2414H
Typical PRO Z790-A MAX WIFI (MS-7E07) Builds (Compare 668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 300%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 379%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO Z790-A MAX WIFI (MS-7E07)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $1,325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback