HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics92.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory43.5 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 10:04
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 169
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 707
62% 529 Pts
64-Core 1025
63% 1025 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
Nvidia(10DE 1F03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.7% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 103
Parallax 115
96% 112 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 108
Splatting 91.9
87% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 181 69 141 183 72 MB/s
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.4% Above average
Read 230
Write 128
Mixed 190
SusWrite 144
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 22.2
77% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 144
122% 177 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 100%
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
377GB free
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 669 673 655 652 659 647 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1210
Write 599
Mixed 751
SusWrite 659
179% 805 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 28.5
104% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 773
DQ Write 524
DQ Mixed 465
397% 587 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 149%
Great: 352%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
440GB free
Firmware: SS16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 55 54 54 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 93.5
Write 84
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 54.4
53% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 60%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
243GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3FD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 67 64 64 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 65.2
Mixed 40
SusWrite 65.1
43% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:83 0B NT4GC72B8PB0NL-CG ID:83 0B NT4GC72B8PB0NL-CG ID:83 0B NT4GC72B8PB0NL-CG ID:83 0B NT4GC72B8PB0NL-CG ID:83 0B NT4GC72B8PB0NL-CG ID:83 0B NT4GC72B8PB0NL-CG ID:83 0B NT4GC72B8PB0NL-CG ID:... 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.8% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 20.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.5
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 24.5" 1280 720 ACR082A KA252Q
Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback