HP 402 G1 SFF Business PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 402 G1 SFF Business PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0266
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140822
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 09:54
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 120
56% 92.1 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 120
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
XFX(1682 3063) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
5.63% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 6
6% 7.23 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 7.4
6% 6.87 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.63%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 73 73 74 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 97.7
Write 96.2
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 73.7
58% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 65%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
116GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 31 31 25 32 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 16GB
1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 32" 1280 720 PLC0003 PHILCO TV
Typical 402 G1 SFF Business PC Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 402 G1 SFF Business PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback