Lenovo 80WQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80WQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 09:51
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 142
52% 89.3 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 239
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 2112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2127
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.94% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 6.2
4% 5.23 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 8.8
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.94%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P200 256GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 130 71 93 79 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 340
Write 276
Mixed 300
SusWrite 120
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 1
21% 6.77 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 44.9
DQ Mixed 41.1
52% 97.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R6N-UH Kingston 9905624-010.A00G 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.3% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 17.3
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO70EC
Typical 80WQ Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback