Asus H110M-E/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	73.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-E/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160919
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	May 07 '24 at 08:46
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 81.5 1-Core 113 2-Core 212 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 647 63% 515 Pts	64-Core 642 40% 642 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 36FC) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.2% Very good	Lighting 90.4 Reflection 102 Parallax 93.3 74% 95.2 fps	MRender 81.6 Gravity 91 Splatting 90.4 72% 87.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBBU240G1122 240GB 2,683 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3106000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 38 44 26 38 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 335 Write 218 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 43.3 33% 152 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 27.4 4K Mixed 13.5 39% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 0.1 33% 79.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 66%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 750GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 168 167 166 166 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 166 Mixed 102 SusWrite 166 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x8GB 4,039 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.5% Good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 20.2 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 18.4 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	27"	1280 720	SAM0D32 C27F390

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $84Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	215x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	189x
Core i3-7100Intel $40Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	168x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	176x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	171x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	109x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	88x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	28x

RAM
CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x16GBGEILBench 73%, 565 samples	56x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	34x
9905678-023.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 4,415 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $171

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16