Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 279%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 344%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics233% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive541% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 04:44
Run Duration345 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$330
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 78.3
1-Core 228
2-Core 454
129% 253 Pts
4-Core 901
8-Core 1,796
159% 1,349 Pts
64-Core 3,189
197% 3,189 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 124%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$590
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
233% Outstanding
Lighting 337
Reflection 326
Parallax 343
275% 336 fps
MRender 469
Gravity 274
Splatting 219
250% 321 fps
Poor: 173%
This bench: 233%
Great: 235%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$146
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1056 4479 4843 2430 1698 1701 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
541% Outstanding
Read 4,504
Write 4,936
Mixed 3,547
SusWrite 2,701
882% 3,922 MB/s
4K Read 84.3
4K Write 238
4K Mixed 107
390% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 1,985
DQ Write 1,445
DQ Mixed 1,721
1,284% 1,717 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 541%
Great: 685%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
931GB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2981 4334 4287 1711 1705 1717 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
484% Outstanding
Read 3,046
Write 4,339
Mixed 3,352
SusWrite 2789
766% 3,382 MB/s
4K Read 89
4K Write 211
4K Mixed 118
398% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,797
DQ Write 1,284
DQ Mixed 1513
1,138% 1,532 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 484%
Great: 521%
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$85
931GB free
Firmware: 620361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3546 4523 4507 4477 4465 4469 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
618% Outstanding
Read 3,968
Write 4,509
Mixed 3,252
SusWrite 4,331
907% 4,015 MB/s
4K Read 73.2
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 97.5
356% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 2,248
DQ Write 1,617
DQ Mixed 1,896
1,426% 1,920 MB/s
Poor: 251%
This bench: 618%
Great: 598%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$99
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01M03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 145 146 139 144 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 137
Write 142
Mixed 69
SusWrite 144
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.6
208% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-7200J3445G162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
152% Outstanding
MC Read 60.6
MC Write 58.9
MC Mixed 57.1
168% 58.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 52.5
SC Mixed 27.4
97% 33.9 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 137%
This bench: 152%
Great: 251%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7166 LS32A70
Typical TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 3,960 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 297%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 390%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z790-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $1,397
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback