HP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-wd0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-wd0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8BA9
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240108
Uptime10 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 02:56
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13620H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 73.6
1-Core 184
2-Core 398
111% 218 Pts
4-Core 699
8-Core 1,102
111% 900 Pts
64-Core 1,561
97% 1,561 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8BA9) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 18.7
13% 19.3 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 18.2
17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znv1t02 KIOXIA 1TB
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP02AN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1370 1517 1545 651 668 663 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,909
Write 1,535
Mixed 1,334
SusWrite 1,069
327% 1,462 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 75.5
246% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 787
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 650
461% 597 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 244%
Great: 336%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA095N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
122% Outstanding
MC Read 48
MC Write 46.6
MC Mixed 47.8
136% 47.5 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 27.5
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 122%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 16" 1280 720 CMN1629
Typical OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-wd0xxx Builds (Compare 300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-wd0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback