Lenovo 30E1S6880S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 208%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 30E1S6880S  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1046
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 00:05
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 64-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 64.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 277
84% 160 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 1,098
98% 826 Pts
64-Core 5,859
363% 5,859 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
HP(103C 8700) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
135% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 178
Parallax 183
151% 182 fps
MRender 207
Gravity 157
Splatting 130
131% 165 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 135%
Great: 139%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDEV1TB-D8 1TB
867GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1226A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1538 1532 1566 1563 1560 1558 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,772
Write 1,532
Mixed 1,186
SusWrite 1,553
340% 1,511 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 30.2
177% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 694
DQ Write 818
DQ Mixed 478
437% 663 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 251%
Great: 317%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27A1 VS278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback