Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 125% UFO	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 175% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	216% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

1 month ago, 30 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago.

System	Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory	121.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150610
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	May 06 '24 at 22:11
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 772 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 66.8 1-Core 68.8 2-Core 141 54% 92.3 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 610 52% 447 Pts	64-Core 2,425 150% 2,425 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760 25,956 User benchmarks, average bench 370% Nvidia(10DE 16F4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.22 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	216% Outstanding	Lighting 238 Reflection 357 Parallax 522 194% 373 fps	MRender 505 Gravity 555 Splatting 261 342% 440 fps
Poor: 303% ↑ This bench: 216% Great: 407%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S280-240GB 240GB 2,188 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: O1015A SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 216 168 80 87 82 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.2% Above average	Read 228 Write 219 Mixed 84 SusWrite 142 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 25.6 4K Mixed 29.7 89% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 91.9 96% 156 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 100%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 406GB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 35 36 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT84GL7AMR4C-R 4x31.8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4 of 8 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.3% Above average	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 18 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.5 18% 6.37 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	44	8	60	23.5"	1280 720	SAM0D2C C24F390

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $175Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $361

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16