PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME B365M-K (all builds) |
Memory | 2.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190801 |
Uptime | 1.4 Days |
Run Date | May 06 '24 at 21:39 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
50.9%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
58.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 262 294 245 271 278 MB/s
|
79.9%
Very good
|
|||
Microsoft Storage Space Device 966GB
198GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 269 299 249 275 281 MB/s
|
87.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
52.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 61 | 44 | 60 | 23.5" | 1280 720 | SAM0D2C C24F390 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 990x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $130Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 195x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 105x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 279x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 130x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 122x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $487 |