Asus X411UN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X411UN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X411UN
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180320
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 18:17
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 55
2-Core 98.1
46% 73.5 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 231
24% 190 Pts
64-Core 253
16% 253 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 15AE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.78% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 5.6
4% 5.07 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 9.6
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.78%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 144 145 140 155 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 396
Write 242
Mixed 173
SusWrite 145
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 17.8
71% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 145
122% 174 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G1B1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.5% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.4
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 13.9" 1280 720 AUO423D
Typical X411UN Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X411UN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback