TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IV
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit, Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220601
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 16:44
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 80
1-Core 113
2-Core 219
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 858
79% 660 Pts
64-Core 1,072
66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 82.9%
 Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1E21) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.1% Very good
Lighting 92.5
Reflection 95.8
Parallax 89.3
75% 92.5 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 80.3
Splatting 80.1
72% 88.8 fps
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 74.1%
 Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA1T0QFD 1TB
694GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1649 1657 1660 1666 1678 1656 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 1,622
Write 1696
Mixed 1,254
SusWrite 1,661
351% 1,558 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 68.1
220% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 922
DQ Write 851
DQ Mixed 314
393% 696 MB/s
Poor: 137% ↑
This bench: 274%
 Great: 301%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 32.3
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 22.4
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 98.1%
 Great: 101%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 2R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 11% 44 206 46 144 15.5" 1536 864 NCP004D
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV

CPU
Ryzen 7 4800HAMDBench 74%, 26,507 samples555x
Ryzen 9 4900HAMDBench 74%, 1,531 samples65x
GPU
RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples356x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples264x
SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GBWDCBench 188%, 12,375 samples100x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples88x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1002 1TBWDCBench 224%, 12,046 samples55x
RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 20,634 samples126x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples120x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples31x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback