HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-d0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics65.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Victus by HP Laptop 16-d0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88F9
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230807
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 15:32
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 64.6
1-Core 146
2-Core 274
86% 162 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 815
83% 674 Pts
64-Core 970
60% 970 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
HP(103C 88F9) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4680
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.2% Good
Lighting 86.1
Reflection 81.6
Parallax 77.3
70% 81.7 fps
MRender 76.5
Gravity 66
Splatting 63.5
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00BH1 512GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2NGXH Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2324
Write 2,071
Mixed 1,162
410% 1,853 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 51.9
186% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 808
DQ Write 489
DQ Mixed 682
499% 660 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 397%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S1MR-4 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.4% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 15.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 13.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 16" 1536 793 BOE0AAD
Typical Victus by HP Laptop 16-d0xxx Builds (Compare 4,023 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-d0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback