Lenovo 81VV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 81VV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory15.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220504
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 13:20
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67% Good
Memory 62.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 220
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 461
56% 431 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 67%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G4
Legend(17AA 3F1A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
5.23% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 7.6
5% 6.53 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 0.3
6% 7.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.23%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 462 426 423 423 426 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 2,145
Write 1,997
Mixed 1,300
SusWrite 438
328% 1,470 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 70.6
231% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 892
DQ Write 658
DQ Mixed 623
507% 724 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 219%
Great: 264%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB16GS3200.C8FT Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 20GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.2% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12.1
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 11.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 4 38 2 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14D6
Typical 81VV Builds (Compare 371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81VV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback