TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 N6506MV_N6506MV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive469% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 N6506MV_N6506MV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N6506MV
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB
DisplayЦвета: 2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 12:54
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Memory 57.2
1-Core 176
2-Core 372
101% 202 Pts
4-Core 744
8-Core 1,285
123% 1,015 Pts
64-Core 2,078
129% 2,078 Pts
Poor: 85% ↑
This bench: 98.3%
 Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics
Asus(1043 36A8) 1GB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5008
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
25.2% Poor
Lighting 30.2
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 51.6
25% 33.9 fps
MRender 16.5
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 41.5
26% 30.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 25.2%
 Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1102 1TB
917GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74114000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3129 3134 3119 3164 3123 3092 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
469% Outstanding
Read 3,616
Write 3,280
Mixed 2,443
SusWrite 3,127
700% 3,117 MB/s
4K Read 61.8
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 81.6
287% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,432
DQ Write 572
DQ Mixed 611
555% 871 MB/s
Poor: 203% ↑
This bench: 469%
 Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H5CG46AGBDX Samsung M425R1GB4PB0-CWMOD 16GB
5600, 5600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
134% Outstanding
MC Read 59.4
MC Write 47.4
MC Mixed 52
151% 52.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 28.4
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 132% ↑
This bench: 134%
 Great: 146%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 120 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4180
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 N6506MV_N6506MV Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Asus ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 N6506MV_N6506MV

CPU
Core Ultra 7 155HIntelBench 89%, 159 samples3x
Core Ultra 9 185HIntelBench 95%, 153 samples2x
GPU
Arc GraphicsIntelBench 24%, 842 samples4x
RTX 4060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 113%, 18,525 samples1x
SSD
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1102 1TBNvmeBench 319%, 208 samples4x
PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1102 1TBWDBench 378%, 70 samples1x
RAM
H5CG46AGBDX Samsung M425R1GB4PB0-CWMOD 16GBHynixBench 138%, 15 samples2x
H5CG46AGBDX HMCG78AGBSA095N 24GBHynixBench 112%, 18 samples1x
MTC4C10163S1SC56BD1 Team Group Inc SD5-5600 39GBMicronBench 90%, 1 sample1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback