MSI B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
26 days ago, 26 days ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B22
MotherboardMSI B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22)  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190807
Uptime22 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 11:46
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 89.6
1-Core 131
2-Core 258
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 704
77% 609 Pts
64-Core 720
44% 720 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 96.8
Parallax 112
96% 109 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 107
Splatting 86.5
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 56 58 58 32 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 182
Write 110
Mixed 156
SusWrite 52.8
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 24.6
109% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 72
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 89.6
69% 91.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 73%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
110GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 42 36 36 29 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 137
Write 85.9
Mixed 133
SusWrite 42.3
22% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 30.6
116% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 91.9
75% 107 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 73%
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1451 1457 1449 1506 1565 1514 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 1,863
Write 1,539
Mixed 1,345
SusWrite 1,490
350% 1,559 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 41.3
186% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,166
DQ Write 1,058
DQ Mixed 700
638% 975 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 270%
Great: 394%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
533GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 159 153 146 149 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 154
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 143
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 27.1
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2787 VG27VQ
Typical B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22) Builds (Compare 4,283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B360 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22) - $108

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $460
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback