Lenovo 20HQA0HHNZ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20HQA0HHNZ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HQA0HHNZ
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 06:52
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 128
49% 104 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 107
22% 148 Pts
64-Core 81.7
5% 81.7 Pts
Poor: 20% Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 224F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
1.93% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 7.6
0% 3.83 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 8.8
6% 6.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.93%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA 256GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.9.8341
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 191 166 217 171 210 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 651
Write 584
Mixed 613
SusWrite 200
115% 512 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 41.1
107% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 203
152% 200 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 159%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E6E304EB-EGCF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 2R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 9% 56 81 16 120 24" 1280 720 GSM5C00 LG ULTRAGEAR
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback