Alienware Aurora Ryzen Edition

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware Aurora Ryzen Edition  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0TYR0X
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230911
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 03:08
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 44.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 294
81% 161 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 971
94% 773 Pts
64-Core 1,634
101% 1,634 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Dell(1028 C756) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.09
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 111
Parallax 128
104% 122 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 114
Splatting 102
104% 132 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pm9a1 NVMe Samsung 512GB
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 36310029 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1027 1010 942 997 1053 1013 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,906
Write 1,322
Mixed 910
SusWrite 1,007
286% 1286 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 50.8
180% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 918
DQ Write 861
DQ Mixed 928
686% 902 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 233%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown XW21KG-HYD-NX 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38.9% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 40" 1280 720 SAM0C39 SAMSUNG
Typical Aurora Ryzen Edition Builds (Compare 884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora Ryzen Edition

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $820
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback