Asus Q170M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	60% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Q170M-C (all builds)
Memory	24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190724
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	May 06 '24 at 02:54
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	50%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 78.9 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 189 69% 121 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 475 51% 405 Pts	64-Core 490 30% 490 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Gigabyte(1458 4091) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	60% Above average	Lighting 85.9 Reflection 85.4 Parallax 84.8 70% 85.4 fps	MRender 88.2 Gravity 81.9 Splatting 0.1 40% 56.7 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
VTP256S1SSD 256GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1102A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 107 4.4 107 9.5 14 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Read 346 Write 210 Mixed 9.8 SusWrite 41.3 33% 152 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.3 20% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 97%
VTP256S1SSD 256GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 238GB free Firmware: V1102A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 321 368 378 375 371 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 434 Write 379 Mixed 367 SusWrite 353 86% 383 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 60.6 4K Mixed 17.4 94% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 87.7 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 31.4 75% 147 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-096.A00G Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 32GB 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	69.7% Good	MC Read 25 MC Write 27.6 MC Mixed 23 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 25.6 SC Mixed 19.1 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 83.4 48% 83.4 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	165	27"	1280 720	MSI8CA9 MSI G27C5 E2

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q170M-C Builds (Compare 353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Q170M-C

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $219Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	131x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	73x
Core i5-6400Intel $70Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	42x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	56x
RX 580AMD $120Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	25x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $212Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	18x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 480GBKingston $175Bench 73%, 24,007 samples	14x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
9905622-058.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 67%, 2,759 samples	9x
KYXC0V-MIB 1x16GBKingstonBench 43%, 487 samples	6x
Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GBHyperX $169Bench 83%, 37,519 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $394

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16