Asrock Z690-C/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 192%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 131%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z690-C/ac  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 02:32
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600KF-$235
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 226
2-Core 451
133% 256 Pts
4-Core 901
8-Core 1,617
151% 1,259 Pts
64-Core 2,698
167% 2,698 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 131%
Great: 127%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSI(1462 5057) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 174
Parallax 166
150% 175 fps
MRender 230
Gravity 134
Splatting 116
125% 160 fps
Poor: 121%
This bench: 134%
Great: 139%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI02102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 617 629 663 481 318 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 2,158
Write 715
Mixed 719
SusWrite 474
222% 1,016 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 307
4K Mixed 21.8
252% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,415
DQ Write 737
DQ Mixed 349
454% 834 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 234%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 46.9
MC Write 46.1
MC Mixed 42.6
129% 45.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 47.6
SC Mixed 31.3
99% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 31.5" 1280 720 PNS0277 Pixio PX277P
Typical Z690-C/ac Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 167%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 185%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z690-C/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $689
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback