Microsoft Surface Pro

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMicrosoft Surface Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Pro
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151107
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 23:56
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7660U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 67.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 202
69% 124 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 310
41% 309 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Microsoft(1414 0026) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
7.52% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 7.7
8% 7.93 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.1
6% 8.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.52%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung KUS040202M-B000 512GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXY8AM1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 288
Write 321
Mixed 301
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 50.4
168% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 505
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 372
277% 375 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 170%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
5GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 315
Write 309
Mixed 324
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 22.3
71% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 153
115% 153 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9CCNNNCLGALAR-NUD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.3% Very good
MC Read 23
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 17.9
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 16.8
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 33 120 55" 1280 720 SNYAA04 SONY TV *00
Typical Surface Pro Builds (Compare 2,378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Microsoft Surface Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback