Gigabyte GA-B760M DS3H DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
27 days ago, 27 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760M DS3H DDR4  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230830
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 21:54
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-14400-$162
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 83.1
1-Core 192
2-Core 387
115% 221 Pts
4-Core 686
8-Core 1,178
113% 932 Pts
64-Core 1,691
105% 1,691 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 106%
Great: 111%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 1470) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 181
Parallax 168
134% 171 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 155
Splatting 120
109% 134 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Intel UHD Graphics 730
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.49% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 9.4
6% 10.9 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 9.8
Splatting 11.1
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.49%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 112 99 109 130 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 416
Mixed 305
SusWrite 145
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 53.5
190% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 290
232% 327 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Patriot Burst 120GB
36GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 103 65 64 48 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 490
Write 384
Mixed 356
SusWrite 102
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 29
137% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 177
158% 236 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 88%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
57GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,346
Write 2,132
Mixed 1,502
443% 1,993 MB/s
4K Read 65.9
4K Write 262
4K Mixed 101
368% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 1,006
DQ Write 1,915
DQ Mixed 1,160
966% 1,360 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
247GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 64 61 63 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 57.5
Write 51.1
Mixed 46
SusWrite 63.4
40% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
226GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 159 158 139 140 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 153
Mixed 104
SusWrite 150
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 29.6
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 27.3
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 144 23.8" 1280 720 GSM5BB2 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical GA-B760M DS3H DDR4 Builds (Compare 2,130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760M DS3H DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback