Gigabyte GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211217
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 19:58
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 87.6
1-Core 163
2-Core 292
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 753
80% 640 Pts
64-Core 770
48% 770 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
ASRock(1849 5236) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 141
Parallax 236
96% 165 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 126
Splatting 190
148% 180 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 111%
Great: 116%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 44 590 76 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 950
Write 983
Mixed 870
SusWrite 167
166% 742 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 261
4K Mixed 73.7
304% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 981
DQ Mixed 507
437% 625 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 171%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT16GX4M2C3200C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 36.8
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 28.5
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 206 55 60 24" 1920 1009 BNQ78A5 BenQ GL2450
Typical GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4 Builds (Compare 4,087 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $538
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback