Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 18:57
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$370
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 83.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 293
95% 175 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 1,108
100% 841 Pts
64-Core 2,181
135% 2,181 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1310 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 61.7
Parallax 83.5
0% 48.5 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 45.6
47% 59.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 212 171 180 213 155 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 355
Write 318
Mixed 300
SusWrite 194
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 42.8
135% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 191
146% 198 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 111%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
615GB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 373 374 372 374 376 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 431
Mixed 292
SusWrite 379
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 47.4
154% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 150
127% 185 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 117%
WDC WDS200T2B0A-00SM50 2TB
996GB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 417 429 430 433 429 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 442
Mixed 346
SusWrite 429
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 46.8
148% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 184
143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 117%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
851GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 110 110 109 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 136
Write 122
Mixed 141
SusWrite 110
172% 127 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 1.1
453% 6.13 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 9
DQ Mixed 1
342% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 47.8
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 42.3
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 39
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 116%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 2R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 14% 14 213 56 30 84.6" 1280 720 HEC002F HISENSE
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $25

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $850
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback