MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics89.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A63
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 17:24
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 133
2-Core 259
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 718
74% 596 Pts
64-Core 717
44% 717 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.4% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 108
Parallax 120
90% 113 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 99.9
Splatting 91.6
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 479
Write 290
Mixed 220
72% 330 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 37.2
145% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 122
132% 226 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
176GB free
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 453 372 49 166 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 508
Write 462
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 258
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 0.4
55% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 29.2
DQ Mixed 0.4
25% 64.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 100%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
88GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
69% Good
Read 416
Write 337
Mixed 292
SusWrite 86.6
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 23.7
122% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 137
135% 210 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69%
Great: 85%
Intel SSDPEKKW010T8 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: 004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1324 944 956 946 944 932 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,376
Write 1,478
Mixed 1,373
SusWrite 1,008
347% 1,559 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 76.3
248% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 694
DQ Write 856
DQ Mixed 946
666% 832 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 268%
Great: 302%
Seagate ST9750422AS 750GB-$69
30GB free
Firmware: 0001BSM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 86 91 81 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 88.3
Write 81.1
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 83.8
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 64%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
572GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 93 93 92 94 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 95.6
Write 88.2
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 89
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 31.3
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 45
SC Mixed 32.4
95% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 54.3
74% 54.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 103%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 32" 1280 720 PHL1E52 WXGA TV (3)
Typical Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) Builds (Compare 5,606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $765
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback