Gigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 440%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 563%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics384% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive756% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory52.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240423
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 17:10
Run Duration365 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$462
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 77.6
1-Core 222
2-Core 439
126% 246 Pts
4-Core 870
8-Core 1574
147% 1222 Pts
64-Core 3683
228% 3683 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 120%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
Gigabyte(1458 40C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
384% Outstanding
Lighting 614
Reflection 576
Parallax 779
500% 656 fps
MRender 527
Gravity 569
Splatting 304
366% 467 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 384%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Seagate ZP2000GM30004 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SUESR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7072 7120 7121 2663 3149 2749 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
756% Outstanding
Read 6,195
Write 7324
Mixed 3,175
SusWrite 4,979
1,218% 5,418 MB/s
4K Read 89.5
4K Write 303
4K Mixed 134
468% 176 MB/s
DQ Read 1,425
DQ Write 1221
DQ Mixed 1,352
1,005% 1,333 MB/s
Poor: 394%
This bench: 756%
Great: 785%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB
839GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2360 2166 1192 1184 1193 1194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
363% Outstanding
Read 2,524
Write 2,403
Mixed 1,725
SusWrite 1,548
460% 2,050 MB/s
4K Read 69.2
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 97.9
329% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1581
DQ Write 1,357
DQ Mixed 1,437
1,086% 1,458 MB/s
Poor: 224%
This bench: 363%
Great: 380%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6174 2629 1595 1604 1573 1702 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
439% Outstanding
Read 3,250
Write 6,090
Mixed 3,362
SusWrite 2,546
864% 3,812 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 88.6
286% 99.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,580
DQ Write 1,335
DQ Mixed 1,434
1,081% 1,450 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 439%
Great: 541%
Nvme Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP4000GM30013 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: SU6SM003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5085 5105 5098 5096 5103 5150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
607% Outstanding
Read 2,704
Write 4,415
Mixed 3218
SusWrite 5,106
879% 3,861 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 236
4K Mixed 130
381% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 1,578
DQ Write 1,374
DQ Mixed 1,514
1,125% 1,489 MB/s
Poor: 258%
This bench: 607%
Great: 576%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 2GB
1GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GIGA-BYTE Co Ltd ARS32G60D5R 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4533 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
154% Outstanding
MC Read 59.2
MC Write 62.5
MC Mixed 56.9
170% 59.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 51.1
SC Mixed 31.8
99% 34.7 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 154%
Great: 203%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 26.9" 1280 720 GBT2705 AORUS CV27Q
Typical GA-Z790 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 1,939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $2,281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback