MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150512
Uptime13 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 14:50
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 128
59% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 405
39% 320 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) 2GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.8% Below average
Lighting 41.7
Reflection 45
Parallax 40.2
34% 42.3 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 35.4
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$117
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0919A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 357 390 395 401 382 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 470
Write 414
Mixed 328
SusWrite 365
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 33.8
110% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 191
156% 221 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 86%
Great: 114%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
125GB free
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 234 76 99 59 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 490
Write 415
Mixed 362
SusWrite 122
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 26.5
110% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 1.3
62% 148 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
930GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 170 168 169 169 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 167
Mixed 107
SusWrite 167
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.2
220% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
778GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 144 141 143 140 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 138
Write 106
Mixed 67
SusWrite 141
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX31866C10F/8G KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GB
933, 933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.6% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 11.6
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 11 212 52 60 23" 1280 720 ACI23C4 ASUS VC239
Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback