Razer Blade Pro

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	88.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Razer Blade Pro (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer Razer
Memory	23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180222
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 05 '24 at 12:17
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	LBN-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820HK 18,903 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 183 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 477 52% 413 Pts	64-Core 470 29% 470 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile) 17,197 User benchmarks, average bench 95% Device(1A58 6754) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.1% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 133 Parallax 127 86% 122 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 120 Splatting 110 92% 113 fps
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 212 211 204 201 202 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	161% Outstanding	Read 1,752 Write 998 Mixed 747 SusWrite 238 206% 933 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 72.8 4K Mixed 50 164% 54.5 MB/s	DQ Read 630 DQ Write 498 DQ Mixed 530 406% 553 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 161% Great: 236%
ADATA HV100 1TB 416 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 157GB free, PID a42a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 61.7 Write 81 Mixed 17.5 66% 53.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 15% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6B1 2x16GB 409 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 35.1 MC Mixed 28 89% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 34 SC Mixed 24.8 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 33: 0P 4R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
33%	38%	29	198	22	60	17.3"	1920 1017	SHP145A CRX1200

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Pro Builds (Compare 297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: Razer Blade Pro

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	127x
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples	94x
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 1080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 95%, 17,197 samples	122x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	64x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	59x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	35x
Raid 0 Volume 1TBIntelBench 242%, 17,176 samples	32x
MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 121%, 3,154 samples	24x

RAM
16ATF2G64HZ-2G6B1 2x16GBMicronBench 86%, 409 samples	82x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 23,910 samples	61x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16