Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D3P  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131101
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 10:17
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2310-$90
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2310 CPU @ 2.90GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 153
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 285
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 283
18% 283 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HT3618C1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 187
Write 207
Mixed 164
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 11.3
65% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 69.8
DQ Mixed 13.5
21% 37.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 81%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
81GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 80 80 80 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 92.8
Write 101
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 79.5
60% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
MD3512NSB-HA3G3 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 12.5
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 0" 1280 720
Typical GA-B75M-D3P Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback