Lenovo 20HQA020JP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20HQA020JP  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HQA020JP
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200217
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 09:41
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 66.6
47% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 136
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 224F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.94% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 4
Parallax 6.3
6% 5.83 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 8.9
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.94%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D256 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C480903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 210 230 227 246 245 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 1,164
Write 855
Mixed 644
SusWrite 234
161% 724 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 40.5
126% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 394
DQ Mixed 336
267% 370 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 118%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E6E304EB-EGCF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 19.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 16.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 56 60 14" 1280 720 LEN40A9
Typical 20HQA020JP Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20HQA020JP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback