Alienware x17 R1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive311% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware x17 R1  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware x17 R1
Memory20.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231213
Uptime14.8 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 09:32
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 69.6
1-Core 164
2-Core 316
96% 183 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,032
98% 809 Pts
64-Core 1,386
86% 1,386 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Dell(1028 0A8F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 11
8% 12.3 fps
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 10.2
10% 11 fps
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KXG70ZNV1T02 KIOXIA 1024GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10804106 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2042 1496 1519 1552 1616 1618 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 2,471
Write 2,247
Mixed 1,872
SusWrite 1,640
462% 2,058 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 77.5
261% 91.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,026
DQ Write 373
DQ Mixed 859
593% 753 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 311%
Great: 463%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1E34RCSV1-BF1S 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
79.9% Very good
MC Read 33
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 26.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 17
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 11 360 17.3" 1920 1009 AUOBD90
Typical x17 R1 Builds (Compare 427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware x17 R1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback