Gigabyte GA-B365M HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive21.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte B365MHD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B365M HD3  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 08:10
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 71.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 229
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 511
61% 471 Pts
64-Core 528
33% 528 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 18.3
14% 17.9 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 16.5
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.2 14 10 12 5.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 329
Write 52.7
Mixed 14.4
SusWrite 9
21% 101 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 0.8
29% 7.97 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
V02D4L88GB1G81G82400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.9% Above average
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18.8
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELF10F DELL SE2219HX
Typical GA-B365M HD3 Builds (Compare 486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365M HD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $382
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback