Quanta NL8C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQuanta NL8C  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160105
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 06:29
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 78.7
2-Core 144
59% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 385
40% 324 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Quanta(152D 1129) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30% Below average
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 60
Parallax 37.8
30% 44.7 fps
MRender 41
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 33.8
31% 38 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1122 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 37 21 5.9 21 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.4% Average
Read 244
Write 94
Mixed 92.7
SusWrite 32.4
25% 116 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 16.8
67% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 184
149% 215 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 94%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41
221GB free
Firmware: SM36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 84 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 67.4
Write 60.7
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 84.8
49% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 2
366% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-008.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.8% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.1
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 46 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO11ED
Typical NL8C Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Quanta NL8C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback