HP Laptop 15s-fq5xxx

Performance Results

Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop 48%
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics8.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-fq5xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A20
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230703
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 05:35
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.3% Poor
Memory 11.3
1-Core 162
2-Core 240
68% 138 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 404
36% 306 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8A20) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver.
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
8.17% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 8.8
8% 9.97 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 9.6
9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.17%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPE36P01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 365 453 681 1020 978 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 864
Write 598
Mixed 380
SusWrite 656
140% 624 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 30.6
96% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 80.8
DQ Mixed 254
166% 199 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 112%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GA64D88CX3S-JR 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 7
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 397
10% 397 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 119 70 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO5799
Typical Laptop 15s-fq5xxx Builds (Compare 1,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 16%
Desktop 71%
Workstation 15%

System: HP Laptop 15s-fq5xxx

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback