HP Laptop 15-fc0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Laptop 15-fc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B2F
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 03:49
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 60
1-Core 117
2-Core 226
72% 134 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 478
54% 423 Pts
64-Core 478
30% 478 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8B2F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42.18
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.35% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 11.1
5% 9.4 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.35%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1006 512GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 991
Write 861
Mixed 881
203% 911 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 43.2
147% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 687
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 420
317% 438 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 413%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKCKC0BM-MGCP 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 26.6
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 22.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 82%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO499F
Typical Laptop 15-fc0xxx Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-fc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback