Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	388% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210208
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 05 '24 at 01:36
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 23,588 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 67.2 1-Core 86.5 2-Core 159 60% 104 Pts	4-Core 257 8-Core 348 38% 302 Pts	64-Core 239 15% 239 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 1AB1) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.3% Average	Lighting 53.7 Reflection 59.1 Parallax 48.4 44% 53.7 fps	MRender 42.1 Gravity 44.8 Splatting 46 36% 44.3 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB 29,713 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1MA0V4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 36 35 29 28 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	388% Outstanding	Read 4,282 Write 39.4 Mixed 82.8 SusWrite 33.5 231% 1,109 MB/s	4K Read 531 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 5.3 813% 180 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 388% Great: 181%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB 54,121 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 9.4 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 64: 0P 5R 10G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
64%	56%	43	173	4	60	15.5"	1280 720	NCP002D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT Builds (Compare 2,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 68%, 23,588 samples	1,002x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	806x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	356x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,099x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,065x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	770x
Micron_2200V_MTF 512GBNvmeBench 152%, 896 samples	334x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	216x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	565x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	306x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	109x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16