Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP350V5C-S0FRU
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130704
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 04 '24 at 19:38
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	91%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 80.2 1-Core 77.2 2-Core 161 62% 106 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 306 31% 252 Pts	64-Core 306 19% 306 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0D8) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.07% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 2.7 3% 2.8 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.5 3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.07% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB 7,332 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW200326 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 28 33 52 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 444 Write 379 Mixed 322 SusWrite 56.7 67% 301 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 34.1 4K Mixed 10.4 56% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 16.2 60% 129 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 93%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60 23,997 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 425GB free Firmware: JE3OA50A SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 73 71 72 69 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 71.6 Write 68.2 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 71.5 45% 62 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 1x8GB 1,072 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 6.4 21% 7.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 7.6 22% 7.67 GB/s	Latency 82.9 48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	59	46	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO21EC

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	157x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	156x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	115x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	539x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	37x
Radeon HD 7600MAMDBench 4%, 7,895 samples	19x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $77Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	11x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	114x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	36x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 5,165 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16