Bytespeed Performance Q170M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	96.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Bytespeed Performance Q170M-C (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q170M-C
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160112
Uptime	7 Days
Run Date	May 04 '24 at 19:20
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600-$125 80,688 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 77.9 1-Core 102 2-Core 202 72% 127 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 382 51% 380 Pts	64-Core 393 24% 393 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% EVGA(3842 6678) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Lighting 123 Reflection 129 Parallax 118 100% 123 fps	MRender 91.8 Gravity 126 Splatting 107 89% 108 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 101%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$105 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 253GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 377 384 386 411 405 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 422 Write 416 Mixed 389 SusWrite 372 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 76.4 4K Mixed 47 150% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 317 242% 327 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 137%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 14,300 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 15.6 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 15.9 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 19: 0P 2R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
19%	24%	29	184	21	60	15.6"	1280 720	HAT1560 Kamvas Pro 16

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Performance Q170M-C Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: Bytespeed Performance Q170M-C

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $74Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	8x
Core i5-7400Intel $89Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	5x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	2x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $78Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	3x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
T253X2512G 512GBTeamBench 67%, 14,867 samples	2x

RAM
9905622-058.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 2,797 samples	3x
9905622-058.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 67%, 2,759 samples	2x
HMA41GU6MFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 60 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $351

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16