Amazon g5.xlarge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAmazon g5.xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 18:11
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7R32
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 53.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 183
62% 113 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 266
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A10G
Nvidia(10DE 152F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1710 MHz, MLim: 3125 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.6% Above average
Lighting 42.9
Reflection 214
Parallax 272
35% 176 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 212
Splatting 156
108% 125 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 193%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 32GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 126
Write 187
Mixed 142
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 4.7
996% 6.27 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 41.8
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 23.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1397 490 60 29.7" 1294 1008 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical g5.xlarge Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

System: Amazon g5.xlarge

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback