Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LHB_FX506LHB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LHB_FX506LHB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506LHB
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220209
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 17:25
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 241
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 558
59% 472 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 170D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.65% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 7.4
5% 6.77 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 10.7
7% 8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.65%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 170D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.9% Below average
Lighting 48.9
Reflection 53.3
Parallax 47
40% 49.7 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 44.6
Splatting 43.1
40% 49.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA007
SusWrite @10s intervals: 935 1019 953 896 978 569 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,554
Write 1,054
Mixed 978
SusWrite 892
250% 1,119 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 71.2
242% 84.3 MB/s
DQ Read 613
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 263
334% 585 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 225%
Great: 247%
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
547GB free
Firmware: P7CR402 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1641 2214 1937 1328 1577 1231 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 2,410
Write 2,149
Mixed 1,954
SusWrite 1,655
459% 2,042 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 68.7
222% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,248
DQ Write 940
DQ Mixed 1,082
812% 1090 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 315%
Great: 537%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FF 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 14.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 0R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 13% 31 210 56 165 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LHB_FX506LHB Builds (Compare 1,889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LHB_FX506LHB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback