Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime23.3 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 17:02
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 182
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 633
60% 496 Pts
64-Core 787
49% 787 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 129
Parallax 129
118% 134 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 103
Splatting 99.2
93% 116 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Verbatim Vi550 S3 512GB
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220916a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 402 393 393 408 407 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 360
Write 397
Mixed 383
SusWrite 401
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 23.5
91% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 18.8
DQ Write 5
DQ Mixed 112
56% 45.2 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 101%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
48GB free
Firmware: JA0OA700
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 52 52 53 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
30% Below average
Read 52
Write 52.5
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 52.4
33% 44.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30%
Great: 57%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 500GB
9GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 58.4
Write 30.2
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 38.6
51% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
75% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 41.4
121% 42.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 20
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 108%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 1R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 7% 59 213 57 60 24.1" 1920 1129 DELA07B DELL U2412M
Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback