Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory45.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191218
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 15:27
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$272
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 141
2-Core 265
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 888
85% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,392
86% 1,392 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3975 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 236
Parallax 145
120% 176 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 141
Splatting 126
123% 154 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 117%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP500GM30001 500GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STOSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 453 459 429 391 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 740
Write 1,872
Mixed 460
SusWrite 357
194% 857 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 40.5
142% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 904
DQ Write 492
DQ Mixed 644
493% 680 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 126%
Great: 355%
Seagate FireCuda 510 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
505GB free
Firmware: STES1024 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1687 1032 1033 1030 1030 1026 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,273
Write 2,220
Mixed 1,472
SusWrite 1,140
346% 1526 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 50.5
174% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,065
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 838
643% 881 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 214%
Great: 371%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$306
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 413 437 452 450 454 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 462
Mixed 417
SusWrite 420
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 45.8
149% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 324
244% 327 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 107%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 42.6
MC Mixed 33.7
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 40.6
SC Mixed 30.4
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 105%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 6 206 56 240 27" 2560 1440 SAM105C LC27G7xT
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 15,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $793
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback